Home Latest news Recruitment agency criticised for job ads specifying bra size
Recruitment agency criticised for job ads specifying bra size

Recruitment agency criticised for job ads specifying bra size


Recruitment agency criticised for job ads specifying bra size

A recruitment organization has been censured for promoting employments just for “attractive ladies”, and s well as specifying bra size.
Matching Models in London express itself as “an international hiring organization for wonderful and gifted individuals”.

It publicized for an individual collaborator with “”a classic look, brown long hair with b-c cup”.”.

The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) called it “appalling, unlawful and demeaning to ladies”.

Rebecca Hilsenrath, CEO of the EHRC, said it would compose to Matching Models “requesting them to clear up their procuring hones instantly”.

In the interim, ladies’ uniformity campaigners said its advertisements were “straight out of the 1970s”.

Sam Smethers, CEO of the Fawcett Society, said: “It is extraordinary that they are taking this approach and almost certainly falls foul of equality legislation.
“If we ever wonder why the battle for gender equality hasn’t been won, this is a timely reminder.”

‘Sexy driver’

The office’s originator Nathalie Jansen said: “Our customers are important to us – and looks are important.”

Another employment advert on the organization’s site asks a “hot female driver” to drive a Porsche Cayenne two days a week for amongst £40,000 and £50,000-a-year for a Knightsbridge-based agent and polo group proprietor.

Job legal advisor James Lynas, partner at Winckworth Sherwood, said the advert was “obviously unlawful”, adding anybody could complain to the Equality and Human Rights Commission, who have forces to intervene.

Matching Models job advert

He said an employment tribunal could find the use of phrases such as “beautiful and attractive” were really code for “young”, and in reality discriminatory against older women.

He added: “A male driver who genuinely wanted the job could submit an application and sue for sex discrimination if rejected. Compensation for such claims is unlimited. ”

A statement on the agency’s website states: “It is almost politically incorrect to request someone to work for you that is both attractive as well as professionally equipped with the right set of skills.

“However, our company understands the importance of having the right people representing your company, because after all, first impressions count.”

But Ms Hilsenrath said: “Matching Models are right about one thing; first impressions count, but the important stuff is not about your hair colour.

“If they wish to maintain their reputation, they should act like a business in the 21st Century and consign this type of sexism to the history books.”


What the law says

Under the 2010 Equality Act, it is against the law to say, or imply, that you will discriminate against anyone – including saying that you are unable to cater for disabled workers.

Employers are also not allowed to question a candidate’s age, sexual orientation, marital status, number of children or plans to have children, disability, race or religion.

As for specifying clothing sizes, an employer has to be able to show that it is essential to the nature or context of the work.

Talking about the personal assistant advert, Ms Jansen said: “The client who wants the specific cup size is an older gentleman – he has a specific outfit he designed with Christian Dior. He wants a “Jackie O” look. And he wants a lady with a smaller cup size to fit into the outfit.”

“I recently had an Indian businessman who interviewed 60 women from my firm. He wanted a blonde, blue eyed, Greek woman. He hired 6 of them to work on his plane.”

Matching Models clients include MTV, Louis Vuitton, Coca-Cola, the Renualt Formula 1 team and Harrods.

Ms Jansen said she had hired 5,000 people worldwide and pointed out MTV wanted models with tattoos and piercings.


Leave a Reply